The TLDR: Don't criticize China, you're wrong anyway.

My only issue with Dirk Gently is that it got canned. I can't recommend shows that get canceled without a proper ending.

It'll be interesting to see what Sony will do considering they're not going to pull PC players to PS and PC ports open to door to piracy which is definitely going to increase with the PSN shit. I doubt the PSN data is so valuable they're just going to let people pirate their games. Either they're going to pull out the PC market to prevent piracy or they're going to get rid of the PSN for PC. The latter makes too much sense so it's probably going to be the former.

I technically it might be the first game on the account of the previous 2 being mods.

Also most people have little to no reason to identify plants. Most of the time we don't even eat the whole plant, we eat the fruit or the root or some very specific part of the plant. You could easily identify a potato, but could you identify a potato plant? There are a lot of plants where you see a part of it in the store but you've never seen the entire plant. I never knew I had asparagus growing in the garden because what is sold in the store is not what grown asparagus looks like. We don't eat grown asparagus, we eat the young shoots before they've turned woody. A grown asparagus is inedible and the berries are toxic.

What are you on about? Almost every top person working on Starfield has been there since the days of Oblivion/Fallout 3. Bethesda in general is known for high retention, there's a lot of the old guard there.

If anything you should be complaining that there's not enough new blood in Bethesda.

Pretty much what I've been saying for almost a decade, mostly in response to "game development is expensive, that's why AAA games need *insert extra revenue streams*". My response has always been that games are bloated with feature creep and if there was an actual issue with development costs the first thing you can cut are features that don't really add to the game. Not only do you cut development costs but you arguably make a better product.

Nice to get some validation because it's been a rather controversial opinion. People have argued nobody would buy AAA if it's not an open world with XP, skills and crafting. Or a competitive hero based online shooter with XP, unlockables, season pass and 5 different game modes. I guess now people don't buy those even if they are all those things

Wait, it's all socialism?

Always has been.

Kinda but not quite. The fluid buffer isn't necessary and it's just one pipe going up and down. The idea of a water tower is to pressurize all your pipes with just one headlift pipe. Let's say you need 1800 cubic meters of water to go up 40m. How many mk 2 pumps do you need? Three? Actually you need just one. You take one pipe, add the pump to it and bring it up to 40m, then bring it back down. That pipe is your "water tower". You then connect it to the three pipes you want going up to your factory and all those pipes will move water up to the water tower height. The best part is that you can connect however many additional pipes to that water tower and they all will flow up to the same height without any additional pumps.

Here's a quick 2min video explaining the concept.

Everybody doing it doesn't change the fact that it's a bad thing for customers and a reason for piracy.

But that's on Nintendo. For those people the game doesn't cost $70, it costs $200+ even if they buy a used Switch lite. Nintendo is deliberately leveraging their games to make people buy their console when those people just want to buy the game.

They want to have their cake and eat it too, and that is most likely one of the biggest reasons people pirated TOTK.

Whenever I need headlift on a lot of pipes of the same fluid I build a "water tower". Built properly it should cover all your headlift needs.

Reviews definitely don't paint a good picture of it.

For movement I would take something like a HOTAS over keyboard. For example in games with multiple movement speeds finding the right speed is rather cumbersome on keyboard because the key press is an on/off and not a scale.

Similarly on keyboard movement is restricted to 8 directions. If you need to move in some other direction most people actually use a mouse to compensate for the lack of movement options because it's too cumbersome with a keyboard.

There are benefits to using keyboards but there are places where you can use something better. Analogue input simply gives better movement options.

It’s. just. That. Simple.

Walk away. That’s all you have to do….

Just… walk away.

You really that oblivious to your own actions?

• You butted yourself into this discussion by literally spamming me. Asshole behavior.
• You then insulted me every chance you get. Asshole behavior.
• You then act like I strawmanned your argument. Disrespectful behavior.
• You literally said someone is not a musician if they're too lazy to play an instrument. Asshole behavior.
• And your whole argument is about trying to dictate what is or isn't art which by nature is asshole behavior.

Your decision to not argue with me has had no impact on you being an asshole, you were one before and you'll continue being one afterwards.

There are some exceptions but I generally agree. The keyboard isn't anywhere as precise as an analogue stick. Ideally I would use something like HOTAS for movement and mouse for aiming.

I love how you strawman your own argument to pivot your point when you get called out. No I didn't consider only guitar, but I did the cut off point at electronic instruments like synthesizers, sequencers, samplers etc. because they often end up "hitting the spacebar to start the digital track". But you tell me, do you consider this music? because Aphex Twin was the first artist that came to my mind when you said what you said and he's pretty influential.

Give it a rest man. You’re not an artist in my mind.

I love how you think I'm defending myself here. I'm not an artist in my mind either, in fact I don't even do art. But unlike you I have enough respect for art to know that even if I personally don't enjoy something it doesn't stop it from being art.