xia Now • 100%
...and we all know what that advantage can do! (Covertly looks in IE's direction)
xia Now • 83%
Brain updates? Now with integrated thought-crime prevention using AI-safety training data.
xia Now • 100%
Why has nobody mentioned package managers? I can't be the only one who cares about that...
Me: List things with attribute X. AI: Certainly! Here are some things with attribute X! * A - While it doesn't have X, it does Y. * B - Also doesn't have X, it does Z! * C - Is sorta like A, but without X support. * D - Useful for Z, but does not have X yet. * E - May have X (spoiler, it doesn't) * F - [is completely hallucinated] * B - [because we now we are repeating ourselves?] * G - considered having X, but never did. There's some things with attribute X. I'm such a good AI, is there anything else I can do for you?!
xia Now • 100%
They show a phone on life support, so maybe they dumped it from RAM?
xia Now • 100%
" An artist never works under ideal conditions. If they existed, his work wouldn't exist, for the artist doesn't live in a vacuum. Some sort of pressure must exist. The artist exists because the world is not perfect. Art would be useless if the world were perfect, as man wouldn't look for harmony but would simply live in it. "
Andrei Tarkovsky
xia Now • 100%
Here's a hint:
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
-- Buckminster Fuller
xia Now • 100%
Seems like asking for trouble... and law suits.
xia Now • 33%
Yep, maybe I should just give up trying... if I can't distinguish "an internet stranger telling me what I despise" or "lumping me into a straw-man group" from an ad-hominem attack, then it would turn out just like that last historic revolution you mentioned which employed state-actors controlling and subverting the populace with AI-powered internet robots.
xia Now • 50%
Oof, you're right... I wasn't expecting an ad-hominem attack! With my plan defeated, I Now I will go cry in the corner... it's all going according to plan!
xia Now • 41%
Certainly! First I'll effort for years towards a cohesive (yet under-developed) strategy, then I'll reveal it to internet strangers on a whim for them to murder (like a helpless infant in a crib) that their ego might be stoked and their blackpill bias further confirmed, then I'll cry and give up trying altogether in frustration eventually coming to believe that there is no solution, only to later have my adversaries discover my half-baked plan/words later (being posted on the internet) giving them a chance to develop counter-measures, only to eventually succumb to their doxxing/neutralizing efforts.
xia Now • 20%
Great, now we'll have separate "california-model" ai-models, like cars.
xia Now • 78%
No... by wisdom and strategy.
xia Now • 100%
Cost/benefit. Seems to me like investing a lot of time, and (somehow) being vulnerable (or on-edge?), just to find nothing... most of the time.
xia Now • 100%
New Zealand does not always exist.
I feel safer already... :-/
dalle3 prompt: A hand reaches out of a sea of refried beans, as a person has sunk into them like quicksand. Mostly as a reaction to these infinite-bean-lovers: * [@Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world](https://lemmy.world/u/Tylerdurdon) * [@robolemmy@lemmy.world](https://lemmy.world/u/robolemmy) Bonus shoutout to [@SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world](https://lemmy.world/u/SpaceNoodle) for help with the post title.
"Too many" kinda sounds right to my ear because beans is plural, but the second logically seems right because its served by volume and is not 'countable' as ordinary (non-destroyed) beans might be.
If so, does that mean people actually remember a persons name & face after only one encounter?! If not, why do we pretend they will be upset, and try to hide the fact that we forget an unfamiliar name?
I deal with a lot of VMs for varying purposes, and it seems frequent that my purpose for opening firefox is derailed by some kind of nag. For example, I frequently get the "you haven't used firefox in a while" in vms that I rarely use firefox and have to go disable the "meta refresh" option in the "about:config". Now, I've started seeing this one... it's not even one of the passive banners but a full-page stop-the-world w/ semi-transparent background and right-click prevention. Before I invest too much time trying to figure out how to disable these, or templating profile options en-masse, or the like... I thought I might ask... is there a way I can tell firefox that I only want it to only be a web-browser? i.e. an effective tool and not an attention sink or exciting video-game-like challenge of exploration and closing popups and suggestions while trying to remember why I launched it. Somewhat relatedly, there is some kind of irony with firefox prominently offering to copy a URL without tracking for other sites, but when it is their own ad (however benign it might seem) that they disable right-clicks and load up on the trackers. The above button links to: * https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/switching-devices?utm_source=spotlight-default&utm_medium=firefox-desktop&utm_campaign=migration&utm_content=new-device-in-your-future&entrypoint=device-migration-spotlight-experiment-v2&utm_term=aboutwelcome-default-screen&as=u
write: fstab: no space left on device
dall-e v3 w/ minor post-generation mods. Prompt: A robotic solicitor knocks on a home's closed front door with his right fist knuckles. The robot is dressed in a suit which has a large corporate logo on it and holds a tablet in his left hand.