How is this a violation of copyright law but not outright theft?

Couchfucker Jeffery Dahmer Vance

I can't remember what podcast I was listening to, maybe a Dan Carlin series, but it was talking about how in this post industrialization + propaganda era the breaking point for nations is far FAR more extreme than it was in the before times.

My wife said it's fine

Oh yeah my favorite is a plain cheeseburger with fresh sliced jalapenos. So yummy.

In my experience the spicier jalapenos are also the tastier ones so I have a hard time imagining how this works.

I mean, I also probably wouldn't eat the spicy stuff if I didn't love the flavor - I'm not suffering just for bragging rights! So I'd definitely be down for trying something like the coolapenos here, just would be going into it with some skepticism that it's anything more than a mild pepper with the mild flavor they produce.

Yeah his schtick, while deranged and dangerous, has also become so meanderingly boring and predictable - I have no idea why anyone cares enough about him to vote for him anymore.

I'm sure they'd love to spend the rest of your life with you anyway

I'd even say no more than two properties. Make people apply for a permit to own more than that and put extreme limits on the reasons they could be successful depending on the current market.

I really hope there is more gamesmanship going on behind the scenes at his office than 'this doesn't add up'. But I'm a little skeptical because just game this thing out:

The west claims to 100% support Ukraine yet so far have only done enough to be sure they can stay in the fight. Not enough to outright win. What do outside observers do with that info? If I was China I would absolutely see this as hesitation on the part of the west and recognize that until the west actually does go all in, this will be a source of instability that I can build on to increase my influence in the world. So of course I'm going to play both sides as much as I can get away with, at least until there's a indication that the west's stance on this is changing.

Wish I could disagree with this

Semantics but I mean it does actually indicate more people polling for her instead of Turnip so it's not stretching in that sense.

I think they use that word because in American politics things are so polarized that it really feels like any gain really does seem like stretching the tiny group of people that can be won over like a rubber band.

Agreed, somehow they don't realize what a self-own this is no matter how you look at it

IMO it's even worse than that. At least from what I gather from the AI/Singularity communities I follow. For them, AGI is the end goal - a creative thinking AI capable of deduction far greater than humanity. The company that owns that suddenly has the capability to solve all manner of problems that are slowing down technological advancement. Obviously owning that would be worth trillions.

However it's really hard to see through the smoke that the Altmans etc. are putting up - how much of it is actual genuine prediction and how much is fairy tales they're telling to get more investment?

And I'd have a hard time believing it isn't mostly the latter because while LLMs have made some pretty impressive advancements, they still can't have specialized discussions about pretty much anything without hallucinating answers. I have a test I use for each new generation of LLMs where I interview them about a book I'm relatively familiar with and even with the newest ChatGPT model, it still makes up a ton of shit, even often contradicting its own answers in that thread, all the while absolutely confident that it's familiar with the source material.

Honestly, I'll believe they're capable of advancing AI when we get an AI that can say 'I actually am not sure about that, let me do a search...' or something like that.

This guy capitalisms ^

For those who haven't had their coffee yet this morning - 'middle class' is yet another term they use to divide us and make us fight with each other instead of the real enemy

Mastodon has serious UX problems that even other federated networks don't have. I'm pretty well tech literate and love Lemmy, for instance, but I just couldn't ever get Mastodon to stick for me, like it just didn't have the right feel and wasn't fun to use. And if it's not working for me then it's never going to take off with a more general audience.

Bluesky is a lot better. It still has some issues that I feel keep it from fully replacing Twitter, especially Twitter before Elon screwed it up. But it does manage to keep me checking it, even though it's probably only once or twice a week max.

Why does that work?

Oh thanks for the heads up

Tell me more…

This is the best part of pwning him so bad at the first debate - he looked weak then and they can continue to make him look weak with powerplays like this