Actually there might be a whole bunch more in the wayback machine. (though still not that many) here

Just sort by mime type and check out audio/* for items of interest

According to this you can copy stuff onto it. I assume you've tried to see if you can copy off? If not, then there is probably no way to extract the audio, short of recording it as it plays.

I was only able to find a couple episodes online. One on someone's google drive and a few in the wayback machine, all from this thread

edit: if playapod has an option to store files on an sd card, that's usually stored unencrypted. (on android anyway...)

edit: wait iphones don't even have sd card slots, right? lol

Mintha 1-2 éve lettek volna nyugisabb időközök. Most meg bármikor megyek vele mindig dugig van. (írom egy 4-es villamosról amin pont van hely :p)

Lehet a benzin lett elég drága, hogy az emberek rászokjanak.

Woah! Sweet find!

Around here you're supposed to call the police if you reel in any kind of firearm. Though I suppose they might spare the bomb squad if it's just a frame... and accidents happen, maybe you forget to call it in...

I don't open source because the open source idea values mainly practical advantage and does not campaign for principles.

When we call software “free,” we mean that it respects the users' essential freedoms: the freedom to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without changes. This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of “free speech,” not “free beer.”

These freedoms are vitally important. They are essential, not just for the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote social solidarity—that is, sharing and cooperation. They become even more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized. In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes increasingly essential for freedom in general.

Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the public schools of some regions of India and Spain now teach all students to use the free GNU/Linux operating system. Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical reasons for which we developed this system and built the free software community, because nowadays this system and community are more often spoken of as “open source,” attributing them to a different philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly mentioned.

Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a typical example. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the many that don't.

The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.