Which is why we can't give in to defeatism and it's dangerous to frame discussion with the notion that Harris is "on track to [...] lose." It's not over until the election is over.

Nothing is guaranteed in this election. Talk of Harris as though she's definitely going to win or definitely going to lose only serves to depress voter turnout because people think their votes aren't necessary.

Vote like your rights depend on it; encourage everyone you know to do the same.

I dunno, I think the result is fabulous. I still don't know why everyone was so obsessed with tomatoes, but this website is great fun.

Oooh, I hadn't considered that. There will be so many dick drawings in there by the end of the first year.

He got pissed off because she mentioned the Aryan Nations. I'm guessing he doesn't want too much scrutiny on the subject, for some reason. It's a shame his actions backfired because it's all but guaranteed that there's now someone interested in finding out his connection to AN.

Since everyone here is obsessed with tomatoes, I suggest a site that has the visitors vote on whether it's a fruit or a vegetable, and then just redirects to a dancing tomato instead of the results.

I agree. As much as I'd love karmic retribution for the ones who deserve it, I don't want it at the expense of the ones who don't.

My cat. Everything else in my room brings me either misery or a feeling of meh. Cat brings joy, which is difficult for me to obtain.

It's in the setup of the joke

Troubles for Towers Parry may have begun as recently as 2015 when she developed a “rapidly progressive neurologic” condition while working for Swedish Health Services

Ahh, this explains a lot.

Someone forgot to wake them up when it ended.

Yep. Last time I heard this joke, it was about a Jewish owner and an antisemite buying the drinks. And I think you're spot on with #3.

Ah, there's the issue. He never does anything in good faith.

Except maybe kiss himself in the mirror, not sure.

Except for the fact that I can't stand him and don't want to look at him ever, I really like this. I'm having some weird cognitive dissonance because it's both really satisfying for my brain when I look at it but also disgusting.

Xitter: Let there be light fascism! (Until we can make it to complete fascism.)

What? Nooooooooo! SU is one of my comfort shows.

Yeah, agreed. I don't have a viable solution (I wish I controlled my various government representatives, but alas!), but even perfect solutions would be ruined by people. People are why we can't have nice things. :(

(Really hoping this doesn't post multiple times. Seems I'm having some internet issues.)

This isn't really a gotcha question. The answer is yes.

I have no issues with my politicians protecting people from being bombed. I'd love it if we'd also protect Ukraine with such vigor.

What I do have a problem with is when they provide the weaponry needed to commit genocidal actions and effectively encourage said usage by refusing to apply any sort of oversight.

Protecting Israel, or any other country from violence should be considered a good thing. Causing violence to Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, wherever, should not.

Conan O'Brien, breaking hearts across millennia.