user Now • 33%
Because you make it that. Its political for you but for me, no.
user Now • 100%
Graphene already supports Winevine L1 without Play Integrity. It has nothing to do with DRM, its a seperate system.
user Now • 100%
I've always got help, and the moderators are really nice.
user Now • 100%
You practically cant brick it with the very simple Web Installer.
user Now • 66%
That is not a webview. You have to understand what you're talking about.
user Now • 20%
No. Even if a Firefox webview existed, it woul'd not use the extensions from your main browser. An adblock option is available from the native alpha settings if you're interested.
user Now • 50%
This is unrelated. You want to familiarize yourself with the concept of OS integrity and how it is different from data encryption. You can have a passphrase that encrypts your data alongside having access to these hardware features.
user Now • 50%
It has very minimal code and its implemented in a robust manner. Unlike UEFI and the desktop implementation of secure boot, it does work well and it has not yet been exploited on pixels. Its way better to have any kind of OS integrity check than none.
user Now • 50%
What a smart thing to say 🥱
user Now • 40%
The fact that youre illiterate and you're hallucinating stuff i never said, is sad. I will address your concern however.
If you think that they are actually not encrypting the message content, then you're a conspiracy theorist. They have thousands of other ways to track the user and give metadata to law enforcement. There is no need for them to lie about protecting the messages, as none of the regular users care about that. They had more than enough users of Messenger even before it was E2EE.
user Now • 33%
I'd still rather use meta tho (which end to end encrypts the content) than unencrypted plaintext shit that goes straight to the government.
user Now • 80%
user Now • 84%
Switzerland be W Rizz Skibidi af ngl 🤪
user Now • 100%
If you're an adult, and you're interested in children's romance thats the same issue. In fact, all content directed towards older audences featuring this kind of stuff, is directed to, and made by pedos.
What's the point of federation, when we will end up having large clumps of users in specific communites under instances, where the owners of the instance can censor information, and enforce their political ideological false authory over everyone. If somebody doesn't agree they can be banned without any valid reason. Federation is censorship resistant only to large government entities. We fail to realise that the issue with censorship is the owners and admins. And yes, we can meke new instances that support our beliefs and that doesnt censor our speech, but then again we dont have an evenly distributed userbase. Having duplicate communities is cojnter intuitive anyways because it will confuse users. Lemmy is a failed project in my eyes unless they find a way to resolve these issues somehow. Bad example but if i start a torrent, then the people who seed will own just as much of the torrent as i do. I'll be equal with the peers without any upper hand. It cant be taken down or censored. Thats the idea i had.