Just Like Mozilla and Google. 🤔

Auf einer höheren Ebene haben wohl Provider und Verlage die gleichen Aktionäre.

Wenn es darum geht, Menschen zu schikanieren, ist den Deutschen nichts zu teuer.

I tried several editors but always come back to emacs. When I used LaTeX because of AucTeX, then I discovered org-mode and now I do my writing with org-mode and ConTeXt.

Wenn die Leute nicht von einem Unternehmen ausgebeutet werden, haben sie das Gefühl komplett wertlos zu sein.

Außerdem hat das Unternehmen Geld zu verteilen an Influencer und Journalisten.

They copy Trump.

Facebook, Google - all of GAFAM is built on Open Source. GAFAM ist clever.

Jetzt ist der Talk auch online. https://media.ccc.de/v/froscon2022-2763-fediverse_und_selbstorganisation

A knife in the back of small and medium enterprises that offer hosting services. They cannot comply with this. The EU fosters GAFAM.

Mail was decentralized. Then came Gmail. Code alone ist not the solution. We need cooperative operations.

Was Zensursula bisher durchsetzte, war immer eine einzige Katastrophe. Patrick Breyer, der in dem Artikel zitiert wird, weist auf einige Punkte hin.

Ich fürchte überdies, dass dieses Gesetz vor allem gegen die kleinen Fediverse-Instanzen durchgesetzt wird. Die EU versucht seit Jahren durch Auflagen den alternativen Diensten das Leben schwer zu machen. Wer kann denn den geforderten Aufwand als Admin einer Instanz überhaupt leisten?

Learn Argentine Tango.

I can't subscribe to https://lemido.freakspot.net/c/noticias

I think the biggest advantage is also the biggest showstopper as people have to learn, that Briar does not always delivers messages in at once in some milliseconds. As the article says the messages are delivered to the next Briar node and stored until in can be handed forward. Even with internet access delivery can last several minutes. And I don't know how well Briars works if only few people use it.

We, a hosting cooperative in Germany, mentioned Lemmy in a book about free software that we published two weeks before. It is in German and targets clubs, non-profits, foundations and cooperatives. It's free to download. https://www.hostsharing.net/publikationen/vereinshandbuch/

I really like your idea of promoting Lemmy by providing a limited free hosting offer. It gives people the chance to find sustainable funding.

In the book mentioned above we recommended Lemmy as a forum solution. Many organisations like clubs are looking for something like discourse or flarum to replace a mailing list for discussions or a community help desk. If an organisation uses Lemmy for inhouse needs giving accounts to all members the instance is funded by the organisation – and thanks to federation the users can join communities elsewhere too.

This is the organisational approach to sustainable Lemmy instances.

If there is no organisation that pays the bills, I have to look for funding elsewhere, as users won't pay. I have to pass the hat around. But this is not sustainable at all.

Or I could go the usual internet way using ads to fund the instance. Is there a function in Lemmy that could be used as an advertising tool? A broadcast message by the administrator that is published to all accounts. Can instance administrators pin messages in communities? Or can administrators promote messages so that they get higher ranks?

I think of a Lemmy instance for a hobby targeting a community of consumers and producers where the producers are willing to pay for advertised postings.

hostsharing.net is the only hosting coop in Germany. But the website is German only, sorry.

Book a vm in a cooperative where you control the board as a member of the cooperative. In Germany there is Hostsharing, a cooperative founded in 2000 dedicated to green hosting, open source, privacy and security.

I would recommend https://cryptpad.fr/. All files are encrypted locally. You don't need a database.

Not about cooperatives but maybe about the way to run them: I would recommend the book "We the people" about sociocracy.

Buck, John Jr, and Sharon Villines. We the People. Washington, DC: Sociocracy.Info Press, 2007.

The main problem there was that the employees weren’t taken along enough.

Somewhere I heard that the project was suffocated by bureaucracy, whether intentionally or not I don't know. But I can imagine that the lobbying of Microsoft supported bureaucratic behaviour. I wish them all the best, but the history of governmental IT projects is a story of failure.