chemical_cutthroat Now • 77%
I'm so glad I don't have kids. If I walked into a day care and saw that every solid object had a fucking screen on it, I'd burn the place down.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
And then we built another one...
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
And it still doesn't have all of the color variants...
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
These motherfuckers naming USB standards like Capcom named fighting games in the early 2000s. I think I'll wait to upgrade until USB4 2.0 Vs Alpha comes out.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
"Goddamnit, why won't she fart? We both ate the same Mexican food...I know she's feeling it... Just let it go!"
chemical_cutthroat Now • 90%
It's not that good of a line. Maybe the first half, but the whole thing comes off like something an edgy private school kid wrote.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
The lute she told you not to worry about...
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
I feel like this happens with the goblin player in every DND session I run.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
90% of the article was written before the debate even took place, and they didn't bother to spell-check the remaining 10. Nice work, BBC, you got it out quickly, I guess.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
The way I understand it, and I could be very wrong, is that it's like brute forcing the universe while wearing a blindfold. Because the power of a qubit is exponentially higher than the same number of bits, you can get a lot more information from the same amount of processing power. However, if you measure the qubit, it loses all of that information. Instead, you have to set parameters that say things like: solve for x, and then you wait for the solution to be presented from the qubits. The catch is that you can't see how the qubits are working, because if you do, you observe them and the data is lost. You just have to hope that they solve the problem for you. In reality, it wouldn't be that strange of a process, because you wouldn't ask it theoreticals, you would have it solve complex problems that can be solved in some way. That's why computer gaming gets no benefit, you aren't asking for answer to complex problem, you are telling polygons where to be.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 50%
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
I really don't know why people announce these things. They have to know by now that Nintendo will squash anything and everything that uses their IP and/or assets. It's like taking your first Tae Kwon Do lesson and celebrating by telling all your bullies.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 57%
Yeah, it's better to just not support anything, good or bad.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 71%
The copium in some of these comments... Keep giving your money to terrible people so they feel rewarded for their acts and can continue to abuse others. I'm sure that will work out for the best.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
"Pahshaw! Don't listen to Sally over there, she's just having her woman time. When we get home, I'll give her a good knock about and she'll remember herself. Now, where's my paint thinner? I have a frightful thirst."
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
Yeah, but imagine owning something.
chemical_cutthroat Now • 100%
He cuts off a dude's dick and taunts him by eating a sausage in front of him.
I have a Steam Deck, and I love it. It can handle 90% of my library, and it's always improving. I decided to try out a linux distro for my OS, because the biggest drawback has always been the hoops that I had to jump through to get games up and running. I went for Pop OS, since that seemed to be natively friendly with NVidia, and the lowest barrier for entry. However, in Steam, I see that there is a much more limited selection of games compatible with my system. Is there a way around that, to get the same selection as my Steam Deck? Or is it this way because the Steam Deck is a singular platform that is developed for based on specific architecture?
"It's time we grow up," says former moderator of jailbait subreddit.
chemical_cutthroat
lemmy.worldChina #1
Best friends with the mods at c/worldnews@lemmy.ml