Yubishi Now • 100%
They mimic the apple application format to some degree and it is a great way to distribute. The real detriment is sandboxing but with more support this could be included.
Yubishi Now • 100%
I asked a simple question in good faith and the response started with my account being an 8 month old bot account. The poster is not defending their list in good faith, they attack posts that question them, then block you.
Yubishi Now • 100%
I'll say, the sensitivity surrounding this is beyond reproach. I asked how one of the line items related specifically to the "Digital Age" and you immediately responded with negativity. What an odd response.
Yubishi Now • 66%
This is most certainly not "literally" an alt account. There is no need to constantly post. So congratulations on that mischaracterization.
Yubishi Now • 100%
What does #4 have to do with the digital age?
www.cbp.gov
Some very interesting footage taken by U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency.
www.theblackvault.com
I vouch for the US FOIA process when it's not being stonewalled but this article has a disingenuous take. The BlackVault has in the past called on whistleblowers to testify to Congress under oath and now the goalpost has shifted. They want more to prove their statements. Even under oath DG stated the DOPSR report only clears it for it's classification not it's validity. Unfortunately, this is not enough. This is just another attack at a whistleblower who put their money where there mouth is and testified under oath to Congress.
Yubishi Now • 87%
I'm not sure what the point of this comment is within a UFO centric community. Interest in this topic doesn't need to detract from other legislative initiatives. Congress can focus on more than one thing at a time.
This is a huge win for future hearings and movement for disclosure. P.S.They replicated some of the names (Moskowitz joked about this).
Yubishi Now • 100%
It is, but, hopefully, over time it will get better!
Yubishi Now • 100%
Good luck, hoping you enjoy it!
Yubishi Now • 100%
Personally, it does get good once you enter the fantasy world. This is soon after the "tutorial" snowball fight.
blog.torproject.org
This is a new PoW protocol that will be used to defend against DDOSs
Yubishi Now • 87%
If you are referring to DG, then I feel this sentiment is misplaced. He interviewed first hand accounts with the evidence necessary to take the message to the forefront. Also, if Sen. Rubio, and Sen. Gillibrand are to be believed they confirmed that witnesses feel threatened for their lives, in some cases. Armed with this knowledge we can only guess why these first hand accounts would prefer a 3rd party intermediary providing the ammunition to the public. The only hope we can have is that in private these reports are being given to Congress, which, again, based of the senators appears to be the case.
Yubishi Now • 100%
Ha, thanks for that. Fixed.
Yubishi Now • 100%
The very same. Yep.
This presents a serious development and conflict that needs to be addressed.
Yubishi Now • 100%
The night after the UAP Hearing I was discussing with people about the possible connection between the craft discussed in the hearing and this very event. Truely marvelous seeing such a connection.
It is with a heavy heart and a determined spirit that I stand, under oath, before you today, having made the decision based on the data I collected, and reported, to provide this information to the committee. I am driven in this duty by a conviction to expose what I viewed as a grave congressional oversight issue and a potential abuse of executive branch authorities. This endeavor was not born out of malice or dissatisfaction, but from an unwavering commitment to truth and transparency, an endeavor rooted in our inherent duty to uphold the United States Constitution, protect the American People, and seek insights into this matter that have the potential to redefine our understanding of the world. In an era, fraught with division and discord, our exploration into the UAP subject seems to resonate with an urgency and fascination that transcends political, social, and geographical boundaries. A democratic process must be adhered to when evaluating the data and it is our collective responsibility to ensure that public involvement is encouraged and respected. Indeed, the future of our civilization and our comprehension of humanity’s place on earth and in the cosmos depends on the success of this very process. It is my hope that the revelations we unearth through investigations of the Non-Human Reverse Engineering Programs I have reported will act as an ontological (earth-shattering) shock, a catalyst for a global reassessment of our priorities. As we move forward on this path, we might be poised to enable extraordinary technological progress in a future where our civilization surpasses the current state-of-the-art in propulsion, material science, energy production and storage. The knowledge we stand to gain should spur us toward a more enlightened and sustainable future, one where collective curiosity is ignited, and global cooperation becomes the norm, rather than the exception. Thank You
My office will be working with @RepTimBurchett , @RepMoskowitz , and any other Congressional Representative or Senator that wants to get on board to obtain info/documents from the Inspector General as suggested by @ChrisKMellon . The public deserves to know the truth.… https://t.co/7EnuTJx7XE https://twitter.com/realannapaulina/status/1683682165526081537
Not sure if I'm doing anything wrong and I've not seen many results when searching, but has anyone been able to get RedoxOS running in a qube/VM on QubesOS? When I use the live ISO or the IMG it hangs on boot up. Thanks in advance!
Yubishi Now • 100%
This reads like an angry child bent on making sure no one studies this topic. The fact that a skeptic investigator is filling am ethics complaints on the disclosure act is telling that they don't want any truth except one that keeps the phenomenon squarely in the Hocus-Pocus domain.
Yubishi Now • 100%
I understand, though having Graves and Fravor actually testify beings to light, in an official capacity, everything they have been saying in podcasts and blogs. When put under oath, congress has much more incentive, if not prerogative, to go after other pilots that the DoD has shielded from providing any information. This could drive new leads the phenomenon has needed: a program insider (though not directly), and pilots on record.
BREAKING NEWS: EXCLUSIVE: Ask a Pol has confirmed—UFO whistleblower David Grusch is scheduled to testify in next week's House hearing https://t.co/CBkztVRYvj
CONGRESS UPDATE 1) The U.S. Senate today (July 18, 2023) moved the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 2226) through its first procedural gate, 72-25. The new Schumer-Rounds Amendment ("UAP Disclosure Act") was added to the bill without objection,
Yubishi Now • 100%
Date: 26 July Time: TBD Likely channel to watch: C-Span Participants: TBD/To be released
Yubishi Now • 100%
This is a serious change in tone and the narrative coming from one of the major news papers.
Yubishi Now • 100%
I will say, I would watch a show with these characters.
Body of tweet: #ufotwitter We held the 1st meeting of attorneys yesterday w/ Danny Sheehan and Derek Garcia. We are preparing to file lawsuits (dozens or more) against the contractors that are holding the anamolous tech imminently. Contractors can take the amnesty offer to stop these suits.
-- David Grusch and other credible individuals have provided the IC IG details about an alleged program involving recovered ET technology. Since AARO does not have this information, Congress ought to ask the IC IG to assess the issue and report what it learns. --
Source connected to congressional staffers says that they are telling him Grusch will be attending & testifying at the upcoming House Oversight Committee (HOC) hearing, and it is slated to take place between July 20th and July 31st. Sawan has been giving updates on the upcoming hearings in both the House and the Senate. Previously and rightfully, some individuals in this subreddit have questioned where he is getting this information. According to this tweet, we’ll find out by the end of the month if his sources are credible or not. From Sawan on Twitter: “🔥HOC UAP Hearing🔥: talked to a staffer from rep. Luna who deals with the UAP issue * David Grusch will be testifying publically at the HOC * estimating hearing time frame July 20-July 31”
An interesting prepublication paper written by Dr. Avi Loeb and Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick.
www.youtube.com
Some questions and comments 1) This SCG explicitly talks about Navy Intelligence. So would this SCG be applied to another branch? 2) Were the programs that David Grusch mentioned under the Navy? 3) Are SCGs retroactive? If so, where would it apply? 4) If an SCG talked about ET materials would congress question it? What does the SCG state that falls in line with David Grusch's testimony on camera and behind closed doors?