TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
How spread out is the rugby fandom beyond the higher population areas in the south - Perth/Dundee west to Irvine/Ayr etc? Because if 90% of the fans are in that area then it does make a lot of sense to play so much in Murrayfield - especially if the tickets are selling. Its just so much closer than most rugby fans in NZ.
But I agree with you, its hard to get your local people interested in the game if you don't bring the game to them!
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Its pretty hard to say. Super Rugby's success drained interest from NPC, but as noted below Super Rugby just doesn't spread itself around New Zealand much anymore and there are large population bases that don't get many games nearby. One NZs largest population centres in Bay of Plenty has a 3 hour round trip to get to a Super Rugby match, and there just aren't that many folks who will do that for a 7pm kick off.
Palmerston North - Wellington is a 3hr30m round trip, Whangarei to Auckland is 4 hours, Napier to Wellington is 8 hours, Nelson to Christchurch is 10 hours. You might do those trips for an All Blacks test match, but you'd have to be fairly die hard to do it for what is in effect just a quite high level club footie game.
So my thinking with that fantasy franchise setup is to get back to 12 teams in Super Rugby, make the Australian clubs more competitive and then in order to balance downgrading the NPC move Super to a double round-robin (same as the NRL is). That's 22 regular season games which is a lot more than now which helps the franchises make more money (because the live attendance is much more important for them) and more matches gives them the flexibility to spread them around a lot more.
The NPC would have to make way to give this competition room - potentially splitting into a smaller, more development focused regional series and proud provinces like Hawkes Bay would have to accept the trade of Super Rugby games instead of NPC filling McLean Park. But getting 4-5 guaranteed Super Rugby games a year with a new Eastern franchise splitting the remaining 6-7 with Rotorua & Mt Maunganui is a hell of a lot better than 1 every other year.
Cost cap... there's a lot of merit to spreading the talent around but i'd have to think about how it could work in the NZ context.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Just splitting points into different comments because i'm terrible at excessive word counts :)
Can't demote anybody to the NPC from Super Rugby as they're completely separate competitions. Eg the Highlanders are in effect already playing NPC, just as their constituent parts - Southland & Otago.
In part a move to expand the NZ based franchises to 7 teams is to alleviate what NZR want to do to the NPC (along with their media pundits) which is to completely trash it as its costing so much money and not pulling in huge eyeballs.
There's a big contrast between stories like the below, where Hawke's Bay have made profits 25 years running compared to most of the provincial unions which are constantly spending below their means and being a net drain on NZR.
So as much as I hate the idea, the NPC probably does have to change to downgrade its expense, but if that's not coupled with expansion of Super my fear is that NZ will grow increasingly disconnected from Rugby and NZR will essentially be biting the hand that feeds.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
It might sound counter-intuitive, but due to a couple of things (geography & number of games) less clubs in Super Rugby is actually worse for attendance.
Per game attendance is ok, but there aren't enough games to let the franchises boost their revenue, so more teams = more games. Also, more games = more chance of hosting a game in places that rarely see a Super match which might boost interest and average attendance due to not saturating markets.
Taranaki used to be a part of the Hurricanes franchise, but they left to join the Chiefs with an agreement to get a guaranteed match every year in New Plymouth. This was because back then the Hurricanes would only play 2 matches a year outside of Wellington and it was rotated between Hawke's Bay, Manawatū and Taranaki. Things have gotten worse since then as now the Hurricanes play a maximum of 1 match outside of Wellington and its almost always against a poor draw like the Western Force.
The reason I believe its important to play games in the provinces is because otherwise you have huge chunks of population missing out on live Super Rugby altogether, almost nobody is driving the 4+ hours from Napier to Wellington to watch a Super game.
Super Rugby obviously has a bit of a weird structure now with only 11 teams after the Melbourne Rebels collapsed. It got me thinking a bit about what NZR & ARU could change assuming no other countries are going to join, and one thing I wondered was whether New Zealand should deliberately weaken our Super franchises to help make the Australian ones more competitive & hopefully make their public a bit more interested (if they win more). So I started to think about what the population spread was like around New Zealand and one thing that really sticks out is how bottom heavy our current distribution of clubs is. 1 million punters in the South Island get 2 franchises, but 4.5m odd North Islanders only get 3 + Moana Pasifika. Its actually a bit silly that the Highlanders still exist given the population shifts since the 90s. Anyway, that made me wonder if it might be possible to in effect add a 6th New Zealand franchise - which including MP would make 7 based in New Zealand in total, so came up with this before & after table to show how its a much more equitable split. And then 7 NZ, 4 Aus & 1 Fiji gets us back to 12 Franchises and at least in NZ gets more games in front of more people. |Super Franchise|Population Approx|Provinces|Population (2018)|Stadiums|Capacity| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |Auckland Blues|1850k|Northland|186k|Semenoff Stadium|19k| |||Counties-Manukau|^1^|Navigation Homes Stadium|12k| |||North Harbour|^1^|North Harbour Stadium|25k| |||Auckland|1655k|Eden Park|50k| |Waikato Chiefs|920k|Bay of Plenty|321k|Rotorua International Stadium, Mercury Baypark|26k & 20k| |||Waikato|476k|FMG Stadium|25k| |||Taranaki|121k|Yarrow Stadium|25k| |Wellington Hurricanes|950k|Hawke’s Bay|172k|McLean Park|24k| |||Manawatū|248k^2^|Arena Manawatu|15k| |||Wellington|526k|Sky Stadium|35k| |Canterbury Crusaders|725k|Tasman|103k^3^|Trafalgar Park|18k| |||Canterbury|623k|One NZ Stadium^4^|30k| |Otago Highlanders|335k|Otago|235k|Forsyth Barr Stadium|31k| |||Southland|101k|Rugby Park|17k| |Moana Pasifika^5^|-|North Harbour based|-|North Harbour Stadium|25k| - **1** Included with Auckland. - **2** Includes Whanganui in the census data. - **3** From 2026 I think the new stadium is supposed to be in use. - **4** Includes Marlborough, same as the NPC Province - **5** Moana Pasifika are currently, and for the forseeable future going to be playing most of their matches in New Zealand, neither Samoa nor Tonga have stadiums and infrastructure setup to host like Fiji Drua have. - **Population regions not included:** - - Gisborne 50k - because its quite remote from either Hurricanes or Chiefs - - West Coast South Island 32k - because its remote from everywhere |New Regional Franchise|Provinces|Population Approx|Stadiums| |-|-|-|-| |Auckland North|Northland|850k|Semenoff Stadium|19k| ||North Harbour||North Harbour Stadium|25k| |Auckland South|Auckland|850k|Eden Park|50k| ||Counties-Manukau||Navigation Homes Stadium|12k| |West North Island|Waikato|600k|FMG Stadium|25k| ||Taranaki||Yarrow Stadium|25k| |East North Island|Bay of Plenty|550k^6^|Rotorua International Stadium, Mercury Baypark|26k & 20k| ||Hawke’s Bay||McLean Park|24k| |Bottom North Island|Wellington|770k|Sky Stadium|35k| ||Manawatū||Arena Manawatu|15k| |Canterbury Crusaders|Tasman|725k|Trafalgar Park|18k| ||Canterbury||One NZ Stadium|30k| |Otago Highlanders|Otago|335k|Forsyth Barr Stadium|31k| ||Southland||Rugby Park|17k| - **6** I included Gisborne population in this one as with a franchise based in this part of the country they are a bit more included than they are with the Chiefs or Hurricanes.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Tasman|9|8|5|37| |2|Wellington|9|7|7|35| |3|Taranaki|9|7|7|35| |4|BoP|9|6|9|33| |5|Hawke's Bay|9|6|8|32| |6|Waikato|9|5|8|28| |7|Canterbury|9|5|5|25| |8|Counties-Manukau|9|4|7|23| |9|North Harbour|9|3|11|23| |10|Otago|9|4|5|21| |11|Auckland|9|3|7|19| |12|Northland|9|2|5|13| |13|Southland|9|2|4|12| |14|Manawatū|9|1|5|9| **Fixtures:** 4/10: - Northland v Otago 5/10: - Manawatū v Counties-Manukau - Southland v North Harbour - Wellington v Hawke's Bay - Canterbury v Waikato 6/10: - Tasman v Taranaki - Auckland v Bay of Plenty **Notes:** Auckland managing to fail against Hawke's Bay on the Saturday didn't bode well for their effort to take the shield off Tasman, and sure enough they failed again so bar a miracle where they manage to beat BoP and the two worst teams pick up wins they're out. Ditto for Otago. The drama in this round is basically down to how many bonus points North Harbour pick up against Southland, compared to Counties-Manukau against the Manawatū Turbos who are awful. Beyond that there's still another couple of big games. Given recent form Hawke's Bay are unlikely to be much of a challenge for Wellington, but the Tasman v Taranaki game should determine who gets 2nd place and later that day Waikato & Canterbury are basically playing to determine which team they have to travel to for the quarter finals.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I'm very left wing so obviously my opinion is very biased in that direction, but I think Key gets a great deal of pump up from the political commentary classes because he did the politicking part of running a government successfully. He was able to keep the National party on message, was able to fudge away a bunch of different controversies without getting tarred by them and is still probably the most popular National leader of the last 20+ years.
However, if we look back at what Key's government actually did its pretty clear to me that the outcomes of their policies are bad, are being felt now and will be felt for a long time to come.
As one example, tax cut obsession, plus austerity during and after the GFC downturn has seen a huge degradation and under-investment in infrastructure. The only reason they "balanced" budgets is by not putting money in where it was needed. That's why Dunedin, Nelson, Hawke's Bay etc are so desperate for new hospitals and why they are so expensive now.
Its a bit of a blunt exaggeration but the infrastructure you build today is almost always going to be cheaper than what you build tomorrow. And then the infrastructure they did build, such as Transmission Gully, was done as a PPP, which in the long run basically always costs more than doing it ourselves. Massive over-investment in roading and under-investment in rail & coastal shipping also locked in (and now Simeon is doubling down) transport emissions for decades.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Like a whole lot of the decisions of this government, its campaigning. Political theatre to play up fears & misconceptions of a segment of voters.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
What sort of vessel are you travelling in?
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I've never seen a thing like this before, both players were ruled to have lifted simultaneously, both contributing equally to the foul play and both were given a yellow. Somehow the Magpies only managed to score 1 try while against 13 players and almost conceded one too.
Sam Smith, the Hawke's Bay 7 being lifted here tucked his head & rolled so actually came down quite safely all things considered and played out the rest of the match A-OK.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Yeah first phase Australia looked much better, and they were also more patient were able to build phases and still look like they had a plan going deep into them. After 5 or 6 phases the ABs attack fairly consistently fell apart and looked like it didn't really have a successful out.
Pretty consistently through this year though its the out wide defence and then lack of punch on gain line that's the worry heading up north. Defence in particular has gone backwards this year, the system looks very exploitable.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Still think Razor was a bit slow on pulling the trigger on getting the bench on, but the forwards replacements in particular did really well once they were on.
The question from the game is, has Schmidt coached a bunch of lesser players to perform well above their #10 ranking, or are Razor's ABs just that clunky at the moment?
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
As I type, the ABs have only 18 minutes to build a lead before the final quarter begins and we get to see if they'll be shut out 6 games in a row.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Well I didn't expect my prediction for the Magpies to be bang on. Crazy game.
First time I've ever seen two players get sinbinned a simultaneous action of foul play.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Schmidt's still got it with the set plays eh, they're right in the hunt.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Wellington|8|7|7|35| |2|Tasman|7|7|4|32| |3|Taranaki|8|6|6|30| |4|BoP|8|5|8|28| |5|Hawke's Bay|8|5|7|27| |6|Canterbury|8|5|5|25| |7|Waikato|8|4|7|23| |8|Counties-Manukau|8|3|6|18| |9|North Harbour|8|2|10|18| |10|Auckland|7|3|5|17| |11|Otago|8|3|4|16| |12|Northland|8|2|5|13| |13|Southland|8|2|4|12| |14|Manawatū|8|1|3|7| **Fixtures:** 27/09: - Counties-Manukau v Wellington 28/09: - BoP v Northland - Hawke's Bay v Auckland - Otago v Tasman 29/09: - North Harbour v Canterbury - Southland v Waikato - Taranaki v Manawatū 2/10: - Tasman v Auckland **Predictions:** - Wellington 15+ - BoP 21+ - Hawke's Bay 1-^1^ - Tasman 12+ - North Harbour 6- - Waikato 12+ - Taranaki 50+ **1** - I don't know if Folau Fakatava is back from injury yet or not; he's been out the last two games and without him as a 2nd playmaker my Magpies have been dreadful. No ability to relieve pressure means two massive hidings in a row. This is a prediction from the heart, not the head :) **Notes:** Its now the second to last round, and mathematically probably only Manawatū are definitively outside of the top 8, but I think we can assume that Northland and Southland are also no chance given at best they can only be expecting to win 1/2. Otago are also only likely to win 1 more match so there's the 4 wooden spooners confirmed and we only need to pick two more teams to stay or slip out of the top 8. Auckland have had a terrible season, but have 3 games in hand, so could pick up another 15 points, except they are playing Hawke's Bay, Tasman & BoP so are only likely to win 1, they should finish somewhere around 24 points. North Harbour *could* beat Canterbury, and should beat Southland so are potentially looking at a points upside of 6-10 points, but Counties-Manukau have a guaranteed win against Manawatū so for Harbour to make it they really need to push for a win against the Rams. Waikato should pick up another 4-5 points against Southland, even if they lose to Canterbury the following week so are probably safe. So, weirdly the two other teams that are at some risk are Hawke's Bay & Canterbury, purely because neither of their next two games are guaranteed wins. The Rams are probably more likely to get a win given the Magpies woeful form since losing the Shield, but i'd say both of them are likely safe - even if the 'pies get the job done with bonus points rather than wins. As for the top of the table, well with a game in hand, the high spending Tasman Makos are most likely to take 1st place again, followed by Wellington. Taranaki & BoP will both get wins this round, so if Auckland continue to suck and Tasman continue to be good, BoP will secure 3rd in the final game of the round-robin ahead of the playoffs.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I was so impressed with the quality of the Bronco that I bought one of their Rambler's as well. I use that when I just want to grill a couple of steaks for dinner, but my partner also bought be one of the Espeto Sul rotisseries, and I use that with the Rambler as its just about the perfect length for it. I got my brother to fabricate a baffle which lets me hold the lid open, but still keep the box closed for proper air draw & whatnot - its been great for chicken roasts!
I'm quite keen on their offset smokers too, but part of the deal with buying the Bronco was I had to get rid of one of my other BBQs (sold an old Weber Kettle) so I doubt i'll get the thumbs up to add another even bigger one to our collection!
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Naturally, and with this government we're not going to get Aussie style protections around work hours any time soon - but if your employer is going to say, you must be in office bc contract says so, the response should be ok well contract also says work hours are x-y thank you very much.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I meant to post this earlier - its an explainer on how West Kentucky ended up with Mutton BBQ and you'll see why I was instantly hooked that it was something New Zealand should be doing too.
https://www.foodrepublic.com/2012/03/13/a-year-of-barbecue-kentucky-mutton/
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I tend to wrap ribs pretty early in butcher paper (my butcher wraps everything, even if its in a vac bag in butcher paper so I get a supply without trying :) and that really helps to keep them moist. I do the same for bigger chunks of meat to get through the stall as well.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Yeah I was using HA to figure out presence from Unifi and that was very flakey as well. Have a look at Unpoller though, its a decent project and can push metrics to influxdb or prometheus.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
Its only recent releases of Unifi Network that have made it easy to setup local DNS entries - it used to be very kludgy or not possible back when I first deployed PiHole as DNS for me.
TagMeInSkipIGotThis Now • 100%
I really like the frigate project, and the detection models it has are really really good, and that meant I could use really cheap Amcrest (I think) cameras because the brains was on the server end rather than camera end. Plus I kinda prefer the device side to be as dumb as possible as they can often have all sorts of vulnerabilities baked in the more IoT they are.
Though I also really hate Home Assistant so I use Frigate as a standalone app, and I manage notifications in a somewhat roundabout way (mqtt -> loki -> grafana -> pushover). I did that because I got heartily sick of how awful Home Assistant was at determining whether I was, or was not at home.
So now I use Unpoller to get my device states from the UDM, that gets stored in prometheus, and my Grafana alert rule works out if my partner or I are at home based on our device being connected to the WiFi or not; then each MQTT event for a detection it only sends a notification if both phones are away.
- All Blacks v Wallabies - Argentina v South Africa Big news ahead of Bledisloe 1 is that Beauden Barrett is out with illness which sees Jordan move to 15, Reece comes on at 14 with Harry Plumber being named on the reserve bench. That suggests he’s leapt ahead of Havili as the utility player - and in a way it actually does make a lot of sense. Jordan, JB & McKenzie give 3 options at 15, Plumber gives cover at 10 & 12, and ALB gives 12 & 13 cover with the option of Ioane heading to the wing too. Very versatile backs.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Wellington|7|6|6|30| |2|Tasman|6|6|4|28| |3|BoP|7|5|7|27| |4|Hawke's Bay|7|5|7|27| |5|Waikato|7|4|6|22| |6|Taranaki|7|4|4|20| |7|Canterbury|7|4|4|20| |8|Counties-Manukau|7|3|5|17| |9|North Harbour|6|2|8|16| |10|Southland|7|2|4|12| |11|Otago|7|2|4|12| |12|Auckland|6|2|4|12| |13|Northland|7|1|4|8| |14|Manawatū|7|1|3|7| **Fixtures:** 20/09 - Hawke's Bay v Taranaki 21/09 - Northland v North Harbour - Canterbury v Counties-Manukau - Wellington v BoP 22/09 - Waikato v Tasman - Auckland v Southland - Manawatū v Otago 25/09 - Taranaki v North Harbour **Predictions:** - Hawke's Bay 3+ (going with my heart on this one bc after last weekend, the head says its going to be a struggle) - North Harbour 14+ - Canterbury 10+ - Wellington 4+ - Tasman 10+ - Auckland 10+ - Otago 5+ - Taranaki 10+ **Notes:** Including this weekend there are 3 rounds left until the quarter-finals, the current top 4 should make the top 8 though all of them would be hoping for at least 1 win from the next 3 matches. Especially with Tasman & Taranaki having a game in hand, the former should be eyeing up top of the table. Of course, they're a very good team, and clearly well resourced given the talent they have signed up so anything outside of top 4 would have been a fail. I'd say the top 7 are probably going to make the playoffs and its really just about whether North Harbour or Counties-Manukau squeek in last place.
thespinoff.co.nz
Write up from my old mate Max Rashbrooke on the success of the school lunch program, and the likely impacts of the cuts to the program from the National-Act-NZ First government.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Wellington|6|6|6|30| |2|Hawke's Bay|6|5|7|27| |3|Tasman|5|5|3|23| |4|BoP|6|4|6|22| |5|Taranaki|5|4|4|20| |6|Waikato|6|3|5|17| |7|Canterbury|6|3|3|15| |8|Otago|6|2|4|12| |9|Counties-Manukau|6|2|4|12| |10|North Harbour|5|1|7|11| |11|Southland|5|2|7|11| |12|Auckland|5|1|3|7| |13|Northland|6|1|3|7| |14|Manawatū|5|0|2|2| **Fixtures:** 13/09: - Southland v Canterbury 14/09: - BoP v Taranaki - North Harbour v Manawatū - Waikato v Hawke's Bay 15/09: - Counties-Manukau v Otago - Tasman v Wellington - Northland v Auckland 18/09: - Manawatū v Southland **Predictions:** Canterbury 9- BoP 5+ North Harbour 25+ Hawke's Bay 5- Otago 5- Wellington 3+ Auckland 9- Southland 5- **Notes:** Well, after the absolute tragedy that befell Hawke's Bay in their Shield defense against the Mako, i'm hoping Wellington will visit Nelson and at least ensure that Tasman only get to celebrate for a week. That should be a hell of a game with all of the squad ABs being released to play for their provinces and Wellington have been very good so far this season. Last weekend saw a lot of movement in the bottom half of the table - with lots of drama as well. See if you can find clip of wet-ball-gate from the Battle of the Bridge. Absolute dastardly shithousery robbed North Harbour. There's plenty of other good matches ahead this weekend too - BoP v Taranaki should settle who's in 4th place, and the mid-week home game for the Turbos could be their only chance of picking up a win this season. I'm glad the tests are over for this weekend, hopefully the rugby pundits down here will pay *some* attention to the NPC in their shows. But likely it'll get a passing mention while they spend 45 minutes talking up the Wobblies and then at the end of the season they'll have another moan about how nobody cares about the NPC.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Hawke's Bay|5|5|5|25| |2|Wellington|4|4|4|20| |3|Tasman|4|4|3|19| |4|BoP|5|3|5|17| |5|Waikato|5|3|4|16| |6|Taranaki|4|3|3|15| |7|Southland|4|2|2|10| |8|Otago|4|2|2|10| |9|Canterbury|5|2|2|10| |10|North Harbour|4|1|5|9| |11|Northland|5|1|3|7| |12|Counties-Manukau|5|1|3|7| |13|Auckland|4|0|2|2| |14|Manawatū|4|0|2|2| **Fixtures:** Friday 06/09: BoP v Manawatū Saturday 07/09: Auckland v North Harbour Wellington v Southland Otago v Canterbury Hawke's Bay v Tasman (Ranfurly Shield) Sunday 08/09: Taranaki v Waikato Counties-Manukau v Northland Wednesday 11/09: Otago v Wellington **Notes:** The biggest game this round is the Ranfurly Shield match on Saturday night, Tasman have never one it as the combined union of Marlborough/Nelson Bays so they'll be up for it; and of course Hawke's Bay will be desperate to keep their winning record. Whoever wins gets both the log o' wood and top of the table. Other than that, there's a couple of other usually fierce derbies. The Battle of the Bridge on Satuurday, then Otago v Canterbury. Most of the rest of the matches aren't especially exciting. **My Predictions:** BoP 24+ North Harbour 9- Wellington 18+ Otago 3- Hawke's Bay 3- Taranaki 9+ Northland 9- Wellington 6+
www.nzherald.co.nz
Unfortunately that's behind a paywall, but there's ways and means of reading it, eg via RSS subscription to NZ Herald. A couple of notes for the benefit of those that can't read it. Two lecturers in maths education have pointed out that Luxon's claim that there is a crisis is misleading as the achievement data is "based on a new draft curriculum, with a higher benchmark compared to previous years." ie, the standard for achievement is higher, not the level of maths knowledge declining suddenly. In fact "We’ve been tracking student achievement in mathematics at Year 8 for more than 10 years, and in that time, there has been no evidence for improvement or decline." More alarmingly for me, a ministerial advisory group was setup which has recommended a new curriculum even while acknowledging there is a lack of evidence for teaching maths the way it proscribes. That advisory group is chaired by an NZ Initiative idealogue, Dr Michael Johnston and the article almost infers he is basically pushing his own manifesto on how education should be conducted into the curriculum - again, despite evidence it has application to maths education. For anyone that doesn't know, the NZ Initiative was formed by merging the Business Roundtable and the NZ Institute. They are far right neoliberal idealogues and you'll see people cycle through the organisation before going into political reporting or lobbying, or in Nicola Willis case being placed into political party roles.
www.provincial.rugby
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|Hawke's Bay|4|4|4|20| |2|BoP|4|3|5|17| |3|Wellington|3|3|3|15| |4|Tasman|3|3|2|14| |5|Taranaki|3|2|3|11| |6|Canterbury|4|2|2|10| |7|Otago|3|2|1|9| |8|North Harbour|3|1|3|7| |9|Waikato|3|1|2|6| |10|Southland|3|1|1|5| |11|Northland|3|1|1|5| |12|Auckland|3|0|2|2| |13|Counties-Manukau|4|0|2|2| |14|Manawatū|3|0|1|1| **Fixtures:** Friday 30/08: - Northland v Southland Saturday 31/08: - North Harbour v Counties-Manukau - Taranaki v Otago - Waikato v Auckland - Tasman v BoP Sunday 01/09: - Canterbury v Wellington - Manawatū v Hawke's Bay Wednesday 04/09: - Waikato v Northland **My Predictions:** - Northland 9+ - North Habour 18+ - Taranaki 6+ - Waikato 9+ - Tasman 6+ - Wellington 9- - Hawke's Bay 15+ - Northland 6- **1/3 of Round Robin Notes:** With Round 3/9 complete now (the fixtures list I refer to has the playoffs as Rounds 10-12 which is a bit random) I figured i'd entertain myself by doing a bit of a stock-take of where we are at. The defending champs Taranaki are progressing ok with their 1 loss so far coming away to one of the top 4 teams Wellington, are sitting ok, but the draw is a little unkind to them in that their easier games are mostly at home but they still have to play BoP, Tasman & Hawke's Bay on the road. The comp progresses through quarter-finals, semis to the final so they'll make the playoffs but will need to work hard to get the home advantage they had last year. The beaten finalists Hawke's Bay are looking quite good especially this week picking up a win away in Canterbury during the storm week. Time will tell though as its all tough games from now, even this Sunday's match against cellar dwellers Manawatū could be banana peel being the 3rd match in 9 days. Probably the biggest surprise so far is how average Waikato, and how poor Auckland have been. You know you're having a bad season when Southland are ahead of you on the table. The current top 5 look likely to make the playoffs, of the rest Canterbury will surely make it in though are battling a lot of injuries. The table feels a bit similar to Super Rugby this year. The top 4-5 are clear but places 6-12 are still probably anyone's to take and really only Manawatū & Counties-Manukau are looking completely out of the running. Crowd wise - its the usual story. The over-saturated Super Rugby markets that struggled to get people to turn up unless it was a big game struggle to get people to show to the NPC. But the provinces that get one or no Super Rugby matches are having pretty good crowds in attendance from what i've seen so far.
www.nzherald.co.nz
This is my editorialising, but I struggle to see how its not yet more Crusaders bias selecting Bower over Numia. I get that the latter is uncapped and coming off an injury but Numia was probably *the* form prop in Super Rugby this year and is going to be 3rd choice prop, not playing in either game unless there's an injury anyway. Bower's only come back from even more serious injury this year and while he's had some tests under his belt i'd say there's just as many question marks over his international game with answers as unanswered questions about Numia.
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|BoP|3|3|3|15| |2|Hawke's Bay|2|2|2|10| |3|Wellington|2|2|2|10| |4|Tasman|2|2|1|9| |5|Taranaki|2|1|2|6| |6|Northland|2|1|1|5| |7|Canterbury|2|1|1|5| |8|Waikato|2|1|1|5| |9|Southland|2|1|0|4| |10|Otago|2|1|0|4| |11|North Harbour|2|0|2|2| |12|Counties-Manukau|3|0|2|2| |13|Auckland|2|0|1|1| |14|Manawatū|2|0|0|0| **Fixtures:** Friday 23/08: - Hawke's Bay v Northland *(Ranfurly Shield Challenge)* Saturday 24/08: - Counties-Manukau v Tasman - Auckland v Canterbury - Southland v Taranaki Sunday 25/08: - Otago v BoP - Wellington v Manawatū - North Harbour v Waikato Wednesday 28/08: - Canterbury v Hawke's Bay **My Predictions:** - Hawkes-Bay 6+ *(I'm on call this week so won't be at McLean Park :( )* - Tasman 18+ - Auckland 6- - Taranaki 6+ - BoP 6+ - Wellington 27+ - North Harbour 6+ - Canterbury 10-
- Australia v South Africa in Perth - New Zealand v Argentina in Auckland
**Table:** |Pos.|Team|P|W|B|PTS| |-|-|-|-|-|-| |1|BoP|2|2|2|10| |2|Tasman|1|1|1|5| |3|Taranaki|1|1|1|5| |4|Canterbury|1|1|1|5| |5|Hawke's Bay|1|1|1|5| |6|Wellington|1|1|1|5| |7|Southland|1|1|0|4| |8|North Harbour|1|0|1|1| |9|Counties-Manukau|2|0|1|1| |10|Auckland|1|0|0|0| |11|Otago|1|0|0|0| |12|Northland|1|0|0|0| |13|Waikato|1|0|0|0| |14|Manawatū|1|0|0|0| **Fixtures:** Friday 16/08: - Otago v Auckland Saturday 17/08: - Northland v Manawatū - Tasman v Canterbury - Hawke's Bay v Southland *(Ranfurly Shield Challenge)* Sunday 18/08: - BoP v North Harbour - Wellington v Taranaki - Counties-Manukau v Waikato **My Predictions:** - Auckland 13+ - Northland 21+ - Tasman 6- - Hawkes-Bay 6+ *(Hoping to make it to McLean Park for this one)* - BoP 13+ - Taranaki 6- - Waikato 13-
Seeing as I care more about the NPC than any other Rugby I feel like I ought to start a thread for this too, even though i'm the only person here that probably has any interest :) Round 1 Fixtures: - Taranaki v Counties-Manukau - Auckland v Wellington - Canterbury v Northland - Southland v Otago - Waikato v Bay of Plenty - North Harbour v Hawkes Bay - Manawatū v Tasman - Bay of Plenty v Counties-Manukau* *Due to the compressed nature of the competition every team has what's called a storm week where they end up playing 3 times in about 10 days which is why this match is marked as the 2nd game in round 1 for these two teams
- Australia v South Africa in Brisbane - New Zealand v Argentina in Wellington
Massive news for Moana Pasifika, probably the biggest signing announcement in the entire history of Super Rugby. No idea how they can afford him, but I've seen some people suggest they picked up some new finance from somewhere. It'll be interesting to see where he plays, possibly at 7 given Inisi had such a huge season at 8 for them this year.
Decided to tweak it from Summer Internationals bc its been freezing & frosty down here in my part of New Zealand! - Tonga vs Italy - Samoa vs Spain - USA vs Scotland - Canada vs Romania - New Zealand vs England - Australia vs Wales - Japan vs Georgia - Namibia vs Portugal - South Africa vs Ireland - Argentina vs France
Figured i'd write up a summary similar to the end of the round-robin. ## The Losers: **8 - Rebels:** Both a sad and successful way of ending the club. First time making the playoffs, last time playing a game. Some might argue that they spent a lot of money and didn't really get competitive - 8th place was earnt on 5 wins, 9 losses. But they actually played really well at times during the season. Maybe without all the off field stress the slump in the back half wouldn't have been so bad. A decent squad, coached fairly well - but trying to break the sporting market in Melbourne is tough. Even the NRL only has 1 team there in a city of 5 million, vs 9 in Sydney and (sortof) 2 in Brisbane. So small crowds probably leans into weaker home performances. Sad to see them go - the fans they did have were passionate, no idea who can replace them. **7 - Drua:** From some of the smallest passionate crowds to some of the biggest. The Drua are near unbeatable at home in either Lautoka or Suva, and even in the quarter final against Auckland their fans were so loud it almost felt like a home game at times. 6-8 for the season, if they can find a way to consistently win away from home they will easily get a winning record and if they ever got a home quarter or semi, they would be hard not to back to go further. Everybody loves the Drua, and hopes that Moana Pasifika can replicate it! **6 - Highlanders:** Like the Drua, a 6-8 season, the weakest kiwi squad struggled with injuries. When Rhys Patchell was playing they looked like a classic attacking NZ side. When he got injured out of the season up stepped Cam Millar and they went to a simple, old school game of slotting 3s and grinding teams out. I kinda loved it; especially de Groot's nonchalant one arm salute to the posts whenever the referee gave a penalty within 40m. Finally got a win against an NZ team after a long drought, and with a group of younger players maybe they're finally getting a development pathway that catches up with the rest of the clubs. If the playoffs are reduced to 6 next year and the Crusaders aren't having another shocker, they'll struggle to make it. **5 - Reds:** The Reds are the only losing quarter finalist to have a winning round-robin record at 8-6; there's a lot to like about them and their young players will have a lot to draw from in future seasons but boy did they manage to crap the bed at times this season. Particularly away to teams they *should* have been beating. 31-40 away to the Force, 17-14 away to Moana Pasifika after a bye week. You can forgive the losses to the Drua and the Highlanders on the road but to be serious title contenders they'll need to find a way to win one of those and also win home games against teams like the Blues or Brumbies. Possibly their worst result and why I backed the Chiefs 20+ was only just beating the Waratahs who'd only managed wins against the Crusaders before that match. Les Kiss seems like a great coach though and I expect them to do pretty well next year. ## The Semi-finals: Well, given how dominant the top 3 teams were this season (all 12-2 records) its no surprise that with home field advantage the Hurricanes, Blues & Brumbies all made it through. The Chiefs went 9-5 but made light work of the Reds at home in what was in a way the least competitive of the 4 quarters. The Rebels really made the Hurricanes work in the first half, and the Drua and Highlanders competed for a time as well before succumbing to classier outfits. None of the scores were close but they were decent matches; just fairly predictable results given the top 3 teams had double the wins of their opponents! Most of the crowds were on the low side, but the Aus-NZ games tend that way so maybe a bit of a disappointment but expected. **Blues - Brumbies:** This should be a cracker; two great forward packs and direct teams going hammer & tongs. The Blues might be without Tuipolotu which will be a big loss he has been huge at lock for them this season; and Akira Ioane also picked up a niggle. Tricky to pick a winner so maybe just go with the home field advantage? Probably one of those games that needs the squad announcements before making a confident pick. Lolesio & Tom Wright have been great for the Brumbies this season so their backline is working well with a settled midfield combo too. Plus Rob Valetini's floor for performance is so high it's easily other player's ceiling. They have 1 Magpie in Ollie Sapsford so if they weren't Australian i'd be tempted to back them. **Hurricanes - Chiefs:** The 'canes had 4 of my Magpies on the field at once in the quarter so I almost felt like supporting them. Don't know how many people they had at the stadium in Wellington - maybe only 9-10k, but i'd like to think if they'd made a bold call and held the quarter up at McLean park they'd have packed in 13,000 or so which would have looked & sounded cooler. Anyway, the Chiefs have under performed this season and failed in consecutive weeks against the Hurricanes at home, then the Blues away. But they only lost by 3 against the 'canes and can take a lot from how the Rebels used and abrasive defense and heavy work at the breakdown to limit the Hurricanes opportunities. I still think the Hurricanes have enough on defense to hold the Chiefs out, and more on attack to pick up points. If they get a roll on could even be a 13+ win, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Chiefs clinched a tight one.
Figured i'd share my thoughts on how the season shook out and what's coming up in the playoffs. Indulge me! ## The losers: **12 - Waratahs:** Even more injuries than the Crusaders, they've sucked for a few years now and just didn't have the cattle to compete. Maybe next year if they can pick up some decent players from the Rebels. **11 - Moana Pasifika:** Some people rate this year as a bit of a turnaround with a better coaching setup. I'm not sure I see it. They beat the Drua, Reds, Force & Waratahs at "home" but were pretty woeful on the road, including a big game playing in Tonga. They desperately need a real home base (or at least a couple of bases they visit regularly outside of Auckland) and I suspect if SR can't find a 12th team for 2026 they might get dropped for a 10 team comp. **10 - Force:** Of the losers, the Force actually looked pretty good at times. It feels a bit weird due to the allegations which he was acquitted of, but when Kurtley Beale started playing for them, the combo with Donaldson at 10 looked really good. Still they only managed 4 wins - even if they looked hard to beat at home. **9 - Crusaders:** an awful season which the last few rounds showed was more to do with personnel being unavailable than anything else. Take Whitelock, Mounga and Jordan out of a team and they'll lose some stars, but then ask them to do without Taylor, Barrett, Blackadder, Burke and Havili as well and decimate their coaching staff for Razor's benefit. It shouldn't have been a surprise they struggled to win, let alone dominate. On the bright side, their loss was Super Rugby's gain - I think the interest in the comp comes from the unpredictability and SR should strive to ensure no team can dominate like that again, for the benefit of the comp itself. ## The Playoffs: SR has been a season where the top 3 have been awesome - all with 12 wins, then there's been a logjam in the middle until the strugglers who've all had 4 wins except the 'tahs on 2. That makes most of the quarters a little uncompetitive, but still... **Chiefs - Reds:** There's a lot to like from the Reds this year, but they've been really inconsistent and away from home its hard to see them tipping over the Chiefs who've looked good whenever they're not playing the Hurricanes & Blues. Actually to be fair, they've looked ok against them too, but those two are on another level. **Hurricanes - Rebels:** The Rebels form over the last half of the season was awful, I see them getting stomped here. Hurricanes have been too good on attack this seasons. **Blues - Drua:** Everybody knows the Drua are incredible at home, but away they kinda suck. The Blues play a very direct & physical game, they should have even more players coming back for the playoffs and should have a dominant win. **Brumbies - Highlanders:** For a while there it was a chance that the Brumbies could take 2nd, or maybe even 1st place. They are near unbeatable at home. The Highlanders have had huge injury disruptions and have been solid enough but are unlikely to get past this round.