Someone Now • 100%
Isn't there a huge difference between safe supply and safe consumption sites? I agree with safe consumption sites if it keeps people from dying on the streets, but if the safe supply is allowed to leave the site it's not really solving any of the problems.
Someone Now • 100%
I don't think the original story would've blown up if that was what she was initially charged with.
Someone Now • 100%
The original owner was the car dealership that's now selling them. So officially, they were stolen from the dealer, but it really sounds like they were stolen by the dealer from their own customers
Someone Now • 100%
Maria Cruciano and her husband Jim White bought a 1957 Chevrolet from Robert Bradshaw in February 2023. After storing it and making repairs over the winter, they went to register the car in early June, only to discover it was now listed as belonging to Grogan Classics.
White called Grogan, who explained that there had been an error. Grogan offered to sign over the ownership slip and courier it to Bradshaw. White picked it up the next day and registered the car in his name. (Cruciano and White provided CBC News with a copy of the signed slip and phone records documenting the call to Grogan's dealership.)
Yet the Chevy was still declared stolen six months later. The OPP seized and returned the car to Grogan in July.
"[Grogan] absolutely knew our car had been sold," said Cruciano. "We spoke with him. He signed the ownership. He couriered it to Bradshaw.
"And you know what the man didn't say to us? 'Holy hell, that car was stolen! That guy can't sell my car!'"
This is insane. How is it not fraud to report a car as stolen after signing the documents personally?
Someone Now • 66%
I think they'll have a hard time with her new riding as well as the new candidate for her old riding. I think a not insignificant portion of Green voters in Cowichan voted for her personally, because of how she fought for the Valley as Shawnigan's director, and not for the party.
Nearly 80 Hullo ferry employees have voted to unionize, according to the B.C. Ferry and Marine Workers' Union.
Someone Now • 100%
It sounds more like a "whichever comes first, which I'd argue makes a lot more sense. The mortgage on the 60% would be paid off by 25 years and if you sell early you'd basically use any appreciation/the full value to pay back the 40%. In your scenario you could just immediately sell it and pocket the 40% for the next 24 years.
Someone Now • 100%
It's absolutely insane that market value of a studio is over $600,000.
Someone Now • 100%
I don't have confidence in the Liberal government, but I am confident the Conservatives would be worse.
Someone Now • 100%
It's because there is no nuance anymore. With every issue you have to either be 100% on my side or 100% on the other side. So many times people argue for and against things that aren't mutually exclusive. It doesn't mean we should "both sides" everything, but sometimes both sides each have half of a good idea.
Someone Now • 100%
Yeah, I imagine if you're in a city it's a different story. TransLink has been great every time I've used it in Vancouver. Greater Victoria seems to be pretty decent if you're in the core or you're near one of the commuter corridors, Nanaimo seems ok but I haven't used it myself.
I'm in the Cowichan Valley, and like I said all our routes seem to be big loops that go out to all the smaller communities and back to Duncan. The only way I see it being more effective with a similar amount of buses is if there was more of a direct highway route and/or a hub and spoke model. You could then put a local route in each community/ group of communities or even an on demand system if it's more rural. Obviously that's based on my area, but I can't imagine it's much different in many other small towns and spread out communities.
Someone Now • 100%
Honestly I wouldn't start to use the current transit in my area if it was free. The issue isn't cost, it's that the service is stretched so thin it's only usable as a last resort and your day has to be planned around the schedule. On the rare occasion I can't use my car I have ended up walking for an hour and a half because it's more convenient than the bus. I'm just glad I'm not disabled or I'd have to turn some of my outings into overnighters.
Someone Now • 100%
I'd rather live in a modern house I could afford to own that happens to look kinda boring than the poorly converted basement of someone else's boring old house that also looks like every other house on the street.
Someone Now • 100%
Why would you assume they're talking about a foreign election in a country that doesn't even have a Conservative or Liberal party?
Someone Now • 50%
We have our own carbon tax in BC, it has nothing to do with the federal government.
Someone Now • 100%
The rest of us really dodged a bullet, look how they treat their own people…
Someone Now • 100%
Hold on, you can get an apartment in a major city for under $2000? Is the minimum wage in Quebec $10/hr? I don't live particularly close to any city and you'd be hard pressed to find anything more than a studio for $1500, you're looking at close to $2000 for something decent. I wonder how many months it would take to break even after moving costs from BC…
Someone Now • 100%
Might-E Trucks are pretty awesome, but I'm definitely not going to be commuting on the TCH in one.
Someone Now • 100%
And even if this was one of them, it clearly can't be that secretive if we're hearing about it.
Someone Now • 100%
Didn't Harper kind of screw us over by signing FIPA back in 2014? I haven't heard anything about it but those Chinese EV companies will probably sue us over these tariffs.
Someone Now • 100%
If we had vacancy control, we could swing almost every other policy way closer to what the landlords want. There'd be almost no incentive for bad faith evictions, and at the same time the financial impact of having to find a new place to rent would be minimized (if not initially, over time).
Right now we're so far the opposite way, we have to have all these protections in place. Of course landlords would love to toss their long term tenants to get double or triple rent each month, and at the same time it's financially ruinous for a tenant to have to suddenly find themselves an extra $1-2000/mo to afford even the cheapest rental on the market.