SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Yes, provided you meet the criteria, so I'm guessing maybe he doesn't... or maybe he just wants to make the point that MS are earning income from this and yet not providing any more support than a free product is providing.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
He's referring to Visual Studio.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Yes, that's his point. That if you've released your app close to the end of the period, then you're forced to upgrade your app right away, even just to keep getting security patches, on top of any bugs you might already be trying to get on top of with your newly released app. Other systems have a longer support period and you wouldn't be faced with that.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Sorry. Hadn't occurred to me you may not be able to see it (usually it's me who can't see things others post! 😂 ).
In a nutshell it boils down to the release schedule for .NET/C# - which people are paying to use - is too quick with too short support periods. He compares to another language, which is free (from memory I think it was Rust? I'd have to watch it again to see) which has the same short support periods, but is FREE. i.e. what are we paying for if we're not getting support for any longer than something which has the same support period for free? He's saying since MS is charging people for this, the support periods need to be longer, specifically security patches. e.g. if someone releases an app near the end of a period, then has only say 6 months before they have to upgrade it already, just to keep getting security patches. People don't have the option to stay on their stable release for a decent amount of time, even though they're paying for it. He just wants them to slow down the speed and increase the periods (we all know MS is all about pushing out new features over fixing bugs).
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
the .NET environment is vast and can be confusing, especially when new to it.
Yeah it was prompted by someone on Mastodon asking about it, and Rocky saw it. I saw the reply too, and thought it was still a little vague, then a few days later this blog post turns up :-)
BTW if anyone wants to follow him he's Rocky Lhotka. He's on Pixelfed too (and Bluesky), but not as much work stuff on his Pixelfed account.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
I think omitting .net core is not the best decision.
Yeah that confused me a bit too, then I found he talked about it underneath the table
Maybe something to add to the side-bar?
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/19621998 > Beware of this issue if you were thinking of using .NET 9 for Windows apps.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Alas, if only that were always true :-(
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Yep, "change anything the users like just the way it is"
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
My high school taught Java, but I didn’t get OOP
Yes, the correct sequence of events - one thing at a time, basic programming, then OOP. :-)
Python is not that.
It's not a lot of things, which makes it poor for a teaching language.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
P.S.
not just to the point of ignoring, but actively down-voting
I've been downvoted when I've made actual factual statements (which should be upvoted!) - people do like to express their displeasure 😂
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
I guess this community doesn’t want this kind of content, even if it’s the official dev blog
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
No problem. Feel free to ask me questions.
SmartmanApps Now • 77%
...and riding a bike is easy. Now go watch some kids who have never ridden a bike before and see how that's working out for them.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Oh definitely! Different students have different learning styles - some learn by memorising rules (ROTE), some learn by understanding the rules (Constructivist), some are visual learners, some are better at learning in group activities, etc. - and we have to cater to them ALL, to keep them all engaged (here's WHY we have this rule, here's a video about it, here's a group activity about it, here's a worksheet to practise it). But I was referring to the TOOLS that we use with class. We can't use a tool that the advanced students have no trouble with but the less adept students struggle with - we have to use a tool that the whole class can use, and that's what I meant about catering to the lowest common denominator.
Also some (not all) schools have special classes for gifted and talented (G&T) students. And in fact one class I've had in my time is a class which was comprised of half the students had various learning difficulties (such as being dyslexic), though they weren't told that (these days it's all about trying to keep them in the mainstream as much as possible. So in this class the dyslexic student had a regular student sitting next to him for immediate help with reading anything, which left me free to only need to help him with actual educational issues).
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
My first language was Basic, and Pascal is definitely better than that as a first language (it's what it was designed for).
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
That’s silly
Agreed.
This was at a university
As I said elsewhere, I had a much more sensible approach when I went to Uni - we learnt Pascal in first year, and then did OOP in second year, which follows the tradition of only teaching one concept at a time.
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Well, I'm only speaking here for my experience with teaching the U.K. curriculum, but probably the same thing applies elsewhere. I know this much - as a teacher, it's very frustrating!
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
Oh! I just remembered this video. If you wanna know how students can struggle with pseudo code, watch the video. I use this video when I teach algorithms (students are even worse at that than pseudo code).
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
It looks like pseudo code
P.S. as a teacher, I can tell you I have seen students who even struggle to write pseudo code. It's like trying to teach them Greek (not all students, but some, and we need to cater to the lowest common denominator).
SmartmanApps Now • 100%
As it is, when we had to teach them HTML, the resources we were given were using PHP at the same time, so I scrapped that and just taught them HTML myself. We never teach more than one concept at a time, so I don't know how these other things found their way into the curriculum/resources.