PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
dann lass die kubaner doch gehen wenn sie wollen. ah ne warte das geht nicht.
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
"FUCK IP"
did I do it correctly?
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
Not necessarily. Look at Lemmy instances for example. You could call each instance a hub, but the content is pretty much distributed.
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
I see. But still, GitHub isn't the right place for precious code like this. The best would be to have a federated git forge, something like what the forgejo devs are working on.
arstechnica.com
At this point I'm very concerned about the open source industry relying so much on github. You have to remember that any project there can be swept away overnight because it doesn't fit into the agenca of a large company, for example.
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
No, in my eyes PoW is just a waste of resources. At least let them do some useful computation for the node.
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
ml? ich rechne in mol (Ausserdem: das ist keine SI konforme Einheit!!!)
PropaGandalf
Now
•
40%
PoW? Really?
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
can't wait for the servo browser engine
PropaGandalf
Now
•
100%
or just a shitpost that wants to point out exactly that
PropaGandalf
Now
•
66%
metafrage: warum nutzen wir email eigentlich noch so oft?
{ "id": 8412027923, "name": "PropaGandalf", "description": "This is the logo of the freedom-loving PropaGandalf, who immortalised himself on this free and open source canvas with the help of his closest matrix friends.\n\nThe logo incorporates many symbolisms, including:\n- the colours of anarcho-capitalism\n- the open source logo\n- a copyright/copyleft sign turned downwards as a sign of the rejection of all intellectual property (IP)\n- a keyhole representing encryption and the cypherpunk culture\n- a broadcast antenna standing for the spread of the gospel of freedom and liberty", "links": { "lemmy": [ "!propagandalf@lemmy.world" ] }, "path": { "0": [ [ 750, 333 ], [ 750, 346 ], [ 751, 346 ], [ 751, 348 ], [ 752, 348 ], [ 752, 350 ], [ 753, 350 ], [ 753, 351 ], [ 754, 351 ], [ 754, 353 ], [ 755, 353 ], [ 755, 354 ], [ 756, 354 ], [ 756, 355 ], [ 757, 355 ], [ 758, 355 ], [ 758, 356 ], [ 759, 356 ], [ 759, 357 ], [ 760, 357 ], [ 761, 357 ], [ 761, 358 ], [ 762, 358 ], [ 763, 358 ], [ 763, 359 ], [ 764, 359 ], [ 765, 359 ], [ 766, 359 ], [ 767, 359 ], [ 768, 359 ], [ 769, 359 ], [ 770, 359 ], [ 771, 359 ], [ 772, 359 ], [ 773, 359 ], [ 774, 359 ], [ 775, 359 ], [ 776, 359 ], [ 776, 358 ], [ 778, 358 ], [ 778, 357 ], [ 780, 357 ], [ 781, 356 ], [ 781, 355 ], [ 783, 355 ], [ 783, 354 ], [ 784, 354 ], [ 784, 353 ], [ 785, 353 ], [ 785, 351 ], [ 786, 351 ], [ 786, 350 ], [ 787, 350 ], [ 787, 348 ], [ 788, 348 ], [ 788, 346 ], [ 789, 346 ], [ 789, 333 ], [ 788, 333 ], [ 788, 331 ], [ 787, 330 ], [ 786, 330 ], [ 786, 328 ], [ 785, 328 ], [ 785, 326 ], [ 784, 327 ], [ 783, 327 ], [ 782, 327 ], [ 782, 326 ], [ 781, 327 ], [ 780, 327 ], [ 779, 326 ], [ 778, 327 ], [ 777, 327 ], [ 776, 326 ], [ 776, 325 ], [ 777, 325 ], [ 777, 324 ], [ 778, 324 ], [ 778, 323 ], [ 777, 323 ], [ 777, 322 ], [ 776, 322 ], [ 775, 322 ], [ 774, 322 ], [ 774, 321 ], [ 774, 320 ], [ 775, 320 ], [ 776, 320 ], [ 763, 320 ], [ 763, 321 ], [ 761, 321 ], [ 761, 322 ], [ 759, 322 ], [ 759, 323 ], [ 758, 323 ], [ 758, 324 ], [ 756, 324 ], [ 756, 325 ], [ 755, 325 ], [ 755, 326 ], [ 754, 326 ], [ 754, 328 ], [ 753, 328 ], [ 753, 329 ], [ 752, 329 ], [ 752, 331 ], [ 751, 331 ], [ 751, 333 ], [ 750, 333 ], [ 750, 333 ], [ 751, 333 ] ] }, "center": { "0": [ 769, 342 ] } }
mixxx.org
The Mixxx Board of Directors in pleased to announce plans to acquire the AlphaTheta Corporation (formerly known as Pioneer DJ), Serato Audio Research Ltd. and Native Instruments.
Hey fellow linux enjoyers, today I found this interesting article which talks about rethinking the underlying data structures of an OS. I was always very enthusiastic about DBFileSystems but this approach takes it even a step further. It comes with some serious caveats though.
www.phoronix.com
Niri, the scrolling WM, now supports touch input
arstechnica.com
Seriously what is this? Nintendo argues that by instructing users how to extract the prod.keys **from their own switch** the yuzu developers are essencially infringing on the DMCA. So what? Now you can't even freely use your own property anymore because it goes against the design intentions of some big company that just want's to milk their users? > Nintendo goes directly after this argument in its lawsuit, arguing that buying a Switch game only means you "have Nintendo's authorization to play that single copy on an unmodified Nintendo Switch console."
Hello networking community driven by the vision of a decentralised, independent and neutral network, I have set out into the depths of netowrking. I have compared different networks and tried to understand the underlying structures. But my head is spinning from all the research and I've lost track a bit, which is why I'm turning to you. I would like to compare and categorise all these networks according to their protocols using the osi model. I would be grateful if you could help me to fill in the following table as good as possible. You can simply copy it or write your answer in the comments. | **Network** | [WWW](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web) | [Usenet](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet) | [GNUnet](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNUnet) | [Freenet](https://freenet.org/) | [I2P](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I2P) | [Tor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(network)) | [ZeroNet](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeroNet) | [Lokinet](https://lokinet.org/) | [Internet Computer](https://internetcomputer.org/) | |-------------|-----|--------|--------|---------|-----|-----|---------|---------|-------------------| | **L1** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | **L2** | | | | | | | | | | | **L3** | IP | IP | | | | IP | | | | | **L4** | TCP | | | | | | | | | | **L5** | | | | | | | | | | | **L6** | | | | | | | | | | | **L7** | | | | | | | | | |
www.phoronix.com
Hey the cool scrolling wm which has just recently pushed out its first stable release is now following up with yet another interesting update.
www.phoronix.com
Hey folks, remember the post that was made a few months ago about an infinite canvas/scrollable WM? Here we have the stable release of a (onedirectional) scrollable one inspired by gnome's PaperWM. Aaaand... ...it's written in Rust!
Hier ist der meine: https://listenbrainz.org/user/PropaGandalf/
Hello everyone Yes I know, a few months ago [a post](https://lemmy.world/post/40687) with the exact same title was shared in this community by @test626@lemmy.ml. But this was at a time when lemmy was still quite small. I would like to give the topic new momentum. From their wiki: > [ListenBrainz](https://listenbrainz.org/) is a project by the MetaBrainz foundation which allows you to publicly store a record of all of the songs that you listen to. Using this data, we provide statistics, recommendations, and a platform for you and other developers to explore this data. Many of you probably use a music streaming service. You share your user data with the company anyway, and some of it with others. If you feel like it, you can make your data available to the general public and help other open source apps to build their services on this data. ___ Website: https://listenbrainz.org/ \ Wiki: https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Main_Page \ Github: https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-server \ ListenBrainz Android: - https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-android - https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/org.listenbrainz.android
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10542663 > Well to be precise: > - How does one install it? On a hypervisor? On a regular distro + KVM? > - Should I go with Proxmox/Debian/some other distro? > - I already installed [Flatcar Linux](https://www.flatcar.org/), is this also suitable?
Well to be precise? - How does one install it? - What is the difference between a hypervisor/openstack/a container service (podman,docker)? - Should I go with Proxmox/Debian/some other distro? - I already installed [Flatcar Linux](https://www.flatcar.org/), is this also suitable?
> cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/10530523 Hello folks, ___ TL:DR - [Solid](https://solidproject.org/) enables a dencentralized, user owned data storage and SSO - [ActivityPods](https://activitypods.org/) adapts its functionality to the fediverse --- Slowly, things have smoothed out for the fediverse and it has become an everyday thing or even a new home on the internet for many of us. And yet I still don't feel that I can utilise the full potential of this network. One of the biggest arguments in favour of the fediverse has always been that you can communicate with all other services regardless of which service you use and that it doesn't really matter where you register because you still receive all the messages. The reality is often disappointing. Once registered with a service, you can communicate with all other services, but unfortunately often not in the format for which the other media were created. If you then try to log in to another instance with your account, you will also be disappointed - it simply doesn't work. What we are really missing is a SingleSingOn (SSO) solution with which you can log in to any instance and any service. And it already exists! Meet the [Solid](https://solidproject.org/about) project. > [Solid](https://solidproject.org/about) (Social Linked Data) is a web decentralization project led by Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. The project "aims to radically change the way Web applications work today, resulting in true data ownership as well as improved privacy" by developing a platform for linked-data applications that are completely decentralized and fully under users' control. *(Source: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_(web_decentralization_project)), [Solid](https://web.archive.org/web/20180629163803/https://solid.mit.edu/))* In short: Solid stores all your data in a decentralised data store called "pod". Anyone can host their own pod or use a pod provider. The user can then decide which data is made available to which service and can adjust it centrally at any time without much effort. This is also accompanied by the authentication method through [WebID](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebID), which is handled via the Solid OIDC protocol. Solid is designed to revolutionise the entire internet, but specifically for the fediverse there is [ActivityPods](https://activitypods.org/), which aims to combine the advantages of Solid with the nature of the fediverse. This project will probably be the one that will give us the long-awaited interoperability thanks to SSO. And probably as early as [this year](https://activitypods.org/roadmap/)!
Hello folks, ___ TL:DR - [Solid](https://solidproject.org/) enables a dencentralized, user owned data storage and SSO - [ActivityPods](https://activitypods.org/) adapts its functionality to the fediverse --- Slowly, things have smoothed out for the fediverse and it has become an everyday thing or even a new home on the internet for many of us. And yet I still don't feel that I can utilise the full potential of this network. One of the biggest arguments in favour of the fediverse has always been that you can communicate with all other services regardless of which service you use and that it doesn't really matter where you register because you still receive all the messages. The reality is often disappointing. Once registered with a service, you can communicate with all other services, but unfortunately often not in the format for which the other media were created. If you then try to log in to another instance with your account, you will also be disappointed - it simply doesn't work. What we are really missing is a SingleSingOn (SSO) solution with which you can log in to any instance and any service. And it already exists! Meet the [Solid](https://solidproject.org/about) project. > [Solid](https://solidproject.org/about) (Social Linked Data) is a web decentralization project led by Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web. The project "aims to radically change the way Web applications work today, resulting in true data ownership as well as improved privacy" by developing a platform for linked-data applications that are completely decentralized and fully under users' control. *(Source: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_(web_decentralization_project)), [Solid](https://web.archive.org/web/20180629163803/https://solid.mit.edu/))* In short: Solid stores all your data in a decentralised data store called "pod". Anyone can host their own pod or use a pod provider. The user can then decide which data is made available to which service and can adjust it centrally at any time without much effort. This is also accompanied by the authentication method through [WebID](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebID), which is handled via the Solid OIDC protocol. Solid is designed to revolutionise the entire internet, but specifically for the fediverse there is [ActivityPods](https://activitypods.org/), which aims to combine the advantages of Solid with the nature of the fediverse. This project will probably be the one that will give us the long-awaited interoperability thanks to SSO. And probably as early as [this year](https://activitypods.org/roadmap/)!
Hello everyone, I have been familiar with the ominous learning card software anki for a long time. Until now, I've always had a love-hate relationship with this program and have rarely used it. Now my life circumstances have changed and I am now more dependent on this software. And the more I immerse myself in it, the greater my disgust grows. But I want to start on a positive note: - Anki is (practically) the only open source educational software - Anki is based on a sound learning approach - Anki is extremely powerful and versatile - Anki has a huge number of resources - Anki is available on all platforms - Anki is fast and efficient Sounds fantastic, doesn't it? Well, from my point of view there are some big problems. Here is how I see it: - Anki is overwhelming for beginners:A program is there to fulfil a specific task. In the case of anki, it is to provide an efficient and sustainable learning experience. It is expressly not there to spend days optimizing and setting up the program. All these things should happen automatically in the background. If I then want to adjust some parameters myself, I can still do that in the settings. - Anki is cluttered and a nightmare to configure: the more numerous and complex the configuration options of a device or software are, the more indispensable a clear, intuitive, descriptive arrangement and a guiding design become: imho anki fails at all of these points miserably. - The UI sucks and there is no easy way to change it: There is no way to change the appearance in the spplication settings. To do this, you have to rummage through numerous addons or fancy up the cards yourself with some shady hacks. All at the expense of performance, reliability and simplicity of the user. - It is a chore to create, regroup or organize anki cards - The parameters don't adapt comfortably to my learning process: for the fsrs algorithm you have to have no less than a thousand repetitions to optimize the deck. So that doesn't help me at all at the beginning. What's more, as a user, I don't want to know anything about the background processes at the beginning, I just want to learn) - The defaults aren't well optimized: For example, why is the sm2 algorithm used by default and not fsrs if it is that far superior? - It doesn't animate me to learn: Anki is really barebones andI totally agree with making the software as lightweight and efficient as possible, but a good learning program also requires good progress analysis. How often, how quickly, how efficiently or which specific topics you have learned enable you to reflect on your learning process and motivate. - Spaced repetition does not always have to be in the form of flashcards. Multiple choice, cloze texts and other gamification options can not only loosen up learning but also create connections and promote memorization. - Spaced repetition is by no means everything. Remembering facts alone is usually of little use in life. In my opinion, chunking and other learning methods are essential complements that should also be taken into account. Can someone help me to fix these problems in anki as good as possible? I know a lot is personal and also card/deck dependent but maybe I'm missing some obvious things? Thanks in advance!
Now
PropaGandalf
PropaGandalf@ lemmy.worlddigital ghost