The subject of a "Once Upon A Time" episode.

This is how my main feed displays stuff.

I could go into each post and view the posts with usernames, times & dates but honestly? Too much work.

There was something about the speaker being at an unbelievable volume as well?

I think that from now on I am going to use the phrase "sit off" as my new favourite insult. Mostly just to confuse people.

Better than random geese roaming around shouting at Nazgul I suppose........

While I am not saying this is the reason, quite a lot of Twitter users jumped ship, and a fair number came to Tumblr, when Twitter's new owner took over. They thought Twitter might change and become less welcoming towards them, while Tumblr has always been welcoming to almost anyone who wants to join.

Moon Moon is now maybe the most famous werewolf on the internet.

Does that sound like a loser to you?

Ah, I remember the days of the Ancient Storm. It was back in the middle ages, when men were real men, women were real women, storms were real storms and Moon Moons were real Moon Moons...........

Population control.

Gotta start young I guess

Also sometimes if I don't want to admit just how badly I screwed up, I put "#Fix 824 : fixed various issues" as opposed to "#Fix824 : fix to repair the fact I put the wrong select statement in the query in the last upgrade" because who wants to have THAT in the notes?

Yeah -- I am starting to realise I may have misread it.

But Pete Agnew.......... would someone in a band called Nazareth have the potential to be a werewolf?

So Paul Weller is off the hook.

But alas Paul Agnew (a Scottish conductor) may suddenly discover his desire to be a werewolf is not all it was cut out to be...........

(It is amazing just how much fun finding how many historic figures have a with first name starting P and a last name ending with W and who are still alive. You would be surprised how complicated it is).

I don't think that's what it stands for............. although it would make you quite flexible in certain areas :)

(Sorry -- that was beneath me).

Honestly?

No.

The original comment was "you can't reason someone out of a belief they weren't reasoned into" and I was just playing on that by trying to reason them out of the belief that you can't reason someone out of a belief............

Or at least suggest that you can reason someone out of a belief they weren't reasoned into. Because it seems within reason that you can reason someone out of a belief they weren't reasoned into and the reason I suggest that is it seems perfectly reasonable.

(Yeah -- sometimes I just get bored and want to see how long I can keep a sentence going and use the same word in it before it breaks down into total chaos).

I'm not sure I believe that.

I don't think that's true, and I don't think you really believe that either.........

Because astrology is something that lends itself to clear academic reporting?

People with planet sized egos?

The stars of the profession?