www.wired.com

This is strange to me. Did the students create the deepfake nudes or did software create those nudes? A normal image editor program won't just create explicit material on its own, the user has to do it with a mouse/tablet/whatever. But AI algorithms will. Even if the kids were giving the instructions to AI, why isn't the software and/or the company that runs it at least somewhat liable for creating child porn? Suppose the students drew the nudes themselves, but they were really bad stick figure drawings with a name beside them to say who it's supposed to be? Is that illegal? What if they were really good artists and the drawing looked like a photo? At what point is the art considered good enough to be illegal?

arstechnica.com

"...in a demonstration of the risks of connected, autonomous AI ecosystems, a group of researchers has created one of what they claim are the first generative AI worms—which can spread from one system to another, potentially stealing data or deploying malware in the process." 

www.swiftelearningservices.com

Swift offers **[Custom eLearning Development](https://www.swiftelearningservices.com/custom-elearning-development/)** Solutions, enhancing learner performance. Our expertise lies in crafting engaging content using modern instructional and visual design principles, delivering a powerful and impactful learning experience. Trust us to elevate your eLearning journey.